Great Dad Register | Login
2008 presidential election  
 
or
 
 
Most Popular
Most Recent
Republican
Bob Schaffer
Elizabeth Dole
George Allen
Gordon Smith
Jeanne Shaheen
Jeff Sessions
Jim Gilmore
Jim Inhofe
John Barrasso
John Cornyn
John Kennedy
John McCain
John Sununu
Lamar Alexander
Larry Craig
Lindsey Graham
Michael Enzi
Mike Johanns
Mitch McConnell
Norm Coleman
Pat Roberts
Ron Paul
Saxby Chambliss
Susan Collins
Ted Stevens
Thad Cochran
Democrats
Andrew Rice
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
Carl Levin
Dennis Kucinich
Dick Durbin
Frank Lautenberg
Hillary Clinton
Jack Reed
Jay Rockefeller
Jeff Merkley
Joe Biden
John Edwards
John Kerry
Larry LaRocco
Mark Pryor
Mark Udall
Mark Warner
Mary Landrieu
Max Baucus
Tim Johnson
Tom Allen
Tom Harkin
Tom Udall
Archives
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
 

Huckabee's Dissent over Evolution

Posted on 1/8/2008 2:15:00 PM

During a debate recently, Republican candidate Mike Huckabee (along with two other Republican worthies, Tom Tancredo and Sam Brownback) said that he does not believe in evolution. The remark drew exclaim and criticism from many quarters. Many also asked whether a political figure's personal views held any relevance to his perceived ability or competency for the office of the president of the United States.

So, should the personal views of a presidential candidate hold any signifance for the electorate? Actually, yes. Huckabee's views, even if they are ones that he holds on a topic that has no political bearing, are important.

This is so because evolution is a matter of science, and not of individual faith. The question of how life originated on Earth, and the process by which different life forms evolved, is as much the realm of science, as, say, the rationale behind how electricity works.

Accepted, the evolutionary theory is itself still 'evolving'. Also, it has its critics, even within the scientific world itself. Having said that, it remains the most plausible argument that has been put forward to explain the divergence of life on Earth, so what if all the loose threads have not been tied up yet.

Huckabee uses the argument of intelligent design to support his stand. However, the 'scientific' theory of intelligent design is full of holes, and infinitely inferior to the evolution theory. In rejecting evolution in favor of intelligent design, Huckabee shows that he lacks a grasp of the essentials of objective reasoning—a lack that could be dangerous when present in a man running to be the president of the United States of America.



 




 

 
 
 
Home |About us| Contact us | Recommended links | Terms and conditions | Privacy | Article RSS | Video RSS

Copyright © 2000-2019 ElectionSpeak.com all rights reserved.